According
to Seattle P-I reporter, Joel Connelly, Kshama Sawant’s speech at the January
12, 2014 Labor Temple rally for a $15/hour minimum wage included the following
remarks here:
It is
“the nature of capitalism to crush small business . . . capitalism
overwhelmingly sets up small business for failure,” Sawant argued.
Addressing the argument that a $15 minimum wage shock might be too much for
small business, she added: “Small business should not be protected on the
backs of workers.”
Ms.
Sawant’s rhetorical exuberance suggests a “power pyramid” with big corporations
at the apex, small business in the middle, and workers at the bottom. Does it follow from this socio-economic
understanding that the $15/hour minimum wage should be applied uniformly and without
delay to all businesses, large and small alike?
I’m not
sure, but here are a few things to consider. The first is that a $15/hour
minimum wage in Seattle would have relatively little effect on the total labor costs
of large corporations, which hire labor all over the world. If a corporation’s Seattle operations accounted
for 5% of its total labor cost, and 10% of its Seattle labor force were to get
a 50% wage increase, then the corporation’s total labor costs would only
increase by 0.25%.
Now,
consider small business. If a small
business is entirely local, then its “Seattle operations” account for 100% of
its total labor costs. And if 10% of its
employees were to get a 50% wage increase, then this small business’s total
labor costs would increase by 5% (20 times more than the corporation’s labor
cost increase!).
Now, if
for simplicity, we assume that labor accounts for 100% of all business costs,
and that all businesses raise their prices in proportion to their increased
labor costs, then the goods and services sold by big businesses subject to
Seattle’s minimum wage would rise by 0.25%, while the prices charged by small
businesses in Seattle would rise by 5%. All else remaining the same, this increase in
“small business prices” relative to “big business prices” would reduce the
Seattle market share of small business and increase the Seattle market share of
big business. It’s hard to imagine that
Ms. Sawant (or anyone else) would welcome this outcome.
There is,
however, at least one countervailing consideration on the other side of the
ledger, and it concerns the effect of increased spending that could result from
a $15/hour minimum wage. Since small
businesses in Seattle get a much larger share of their total revenue from local
sales than large corporations do, and since a substantial part of the increase
in wages would be spent in Seattle, small businesses would enjoy a
disproportionate share of this increase in sales revenue.
Where
does all this leave us? I’m not really
sure, except to say that, when it comes to policymaking, the results of new
legislation tend to be more appealing when you’ve thought things through in
some detail. And, on this score, I
commend Councilmember Nick Licata for sharing the first of a series of issue
papers on the minimum wage here.
No comments:
Post a Comment